Magazine apps for iPad have been getting a fair amount of bad press recently. Reasons have been many and ultimately, all the reasons given are fine. A magazine is fundamentally about making it easy and pleasant for the reader to ingest information.
Except, with iPad magazine apps, this isn’t happening.
There are a few things that need to happen before the magazines find their groove in a post-internet, tablet-oriented world.
Magazines are having an existential crisis.
Publishers have had a little bit under 150 years to perfect the bound magazine printed onto paper and yet magazines are regularly pushing the boundaries on this traditional form.
Now we’ve moved to digital magazines too.
Is the tablet magazine a whole new product? Is it even a magazine? The fact that we’re calling them magazine apps is probably quite a telling sign that something is not quite right yet. Do we want an app? Do we want to read the content easily?
Navigation is not a straight road.
The beauty of having a paper, printed magazine in the hand is that it has a clear start and end: front cover/back cover. At any point, you can open a magazine and see anything without having to scroll to find it. You can write on it, you can cut it up, you can fold pages, place bookmarks in it.
Navigation is not so easy on a tablet device. Although it should be easy to find things quicker, no magazine has come up with an effective solution to the loss of flow in tablet apps.
Swiping isn’t that different to turning the pages, right? Wrong. It feels completely different, as if a page layout is a picture rather than a thing which you have a tactile response to (a la print magazine)
The traditional issue: touch.
One of the first comments people make about magazines that aren’t printed on paper is usually something to do with the loss of the feeling a lovely product in their hands.
As much as it’s a boring argument, it’s true.
You can’t put an iPad magazine app onto a shelf with all of the other issues you’ve collected, enjoyed and devoured over the years.
It just doesn’t feel the same.
A problem for publishers is a problem for readers.
Possibly the root of the problem, though, is that magazine publishing on tablet devices is not yet open.
All of the systems for publishing magazines on the iPad have been expensive and closed off to the kid in his bedroom who makes awesome print products and wants to move into digital publishing.
Despite his being able to turn out an incredible magazine for almost zero cost and still manage to sell it, or set up a domain and run an awesome blog/website, the tablet magazine market is closed because he doesn’t have 200+ euro/month to pay for a publishing system.
Even though he/she may be able to resolve some of the issues that I’ve just mentioned, until someone offers a cheap way to load magazines onto the iPad, or whichever tablet, he won’t be able to innovate.
Ultimately it’s early days.
The iPad has been out less than a year now. It’s in it’s first incarnation and all of the magazines made unrealistic predictions for the growth of this market. They were so excited by the prospect of an awesome new tool for publishing their awesome magazines that they neglected the experience which makes the awesome awesome.
If even some of these issues are addressed somehow, the future will certainly be a lot brighter for magazines on tablet devices.